Vol. 2, No. 1


  • Library filled with Books

    Letter From EICs

    Written by Marshall Amaya and Minji Kang

    Letter From The Editors-In-Chief:

    Trojan Review proudly presents our first issue of Volume 2, a symposium-themed collection of notes centered on Civil Rights, Individual Liberties, and Substantive Due Process. We selected this theme track after careful consideration and with direct intention: we wanted to select a theme that illuminates some of the most pressing questions that contemporary legal scholars and attorneys currently face. Following Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a litany of questions become unmoored—how, if at all, does the ideological mixture of the Court affect the stability of previous precedents? If so, which precedents? These questions piqued our curiosity and compelled us to explore where those questions led. Our authors received this theme in stride and with impeccable pace…

  • Negotiations

    POST-DOBBS ECONOMIC SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS REVISITED

    Written by Victor Zhang

    Scattered throughout the Dobbs majority opinion, the Supreme Court’s most recent evaluation of substantive due process case, is a 1905 decision, Lochner v. New York, which In Lochner, the Court declared unconstitutional a state statute that placed a cap on the weekly working hours of bakers. The majority rooted its reasoning under an implicit right to freely negotiate contracts protected by the Due Process Clause, and invalidated the law …

  • Prison Gate

    VIRTUAL LIFE, ACTUAL DEATH: WHY ARE DE FACTO LIFE SENTENCES UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN LIGHT OF THE “EVOLVING STANDARDS” TEST?

    Written by Qurui Jiang

    The Supreme Court of the United States has moved towards prohibiting some extreme sentences for juvenile offenders under the Eighth Amendment. This progressive trend, however…

  • Locked iPhone

    DIGITAL SEARCH & SEIZURE: DEPARTURE FROM A BINARY APPROACH OF THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE INTRODUCTION

    Written by Tina Hoang

    The right to privacy first appeared in the decision of Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). Almost a decade later, Griswold became the precedent for the Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade (1973), establishing the right to abortion. Roe has provided protection against state laws prohibiting abortions and guaranteed individuals access to safe and legal abortions nationwide …

  • Scale Justice Image

    SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND THE PENUMBRAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY: THE WARREN COURT TO THE ROBERTS COURT

    Written by Chynna Hinrichsen

    The Framers of the Constitution derived the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause from the Magna Carta’s “law of the land” provision, which guaranteed English liberties.1 Conversely, substantive due process, a considerable part of what the Due Process Clause is now, is not rooted in the text and history of the Due Process Clause…

  • Doctor Holding Patient Hand

    THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN GOVERNMENT INTERESTS AND BODILY AUTONOMY IN ABORTION WITH COMPARISONS TO DISTINCT ARENAS

    Written by Marco DeBellis

    Autonomy, while lacking a consistent definition in the legal literature, and seldom scribed into positive law, appears to be central to the debate of abortion and other medical practices. The term is commonly understood as “the quality or state of being self-governing.” But a philosophical reading warrants …